A Study Of Ethics By Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill

The study of ethics is the study of right and wrong in human behavior. The R.v Lavallee case revolves around ethics. The court released Lavallee as innocent on the basis that she is medically ill with Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS). The two most renowned ethicists, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill would view this case differently. Kantianism is associated solely with Immanuel Kant. In comparison, John Stuart Mill, an opponent of Immanuel Kant’s ideas, uses a utilitarian approach. This essay will briefly give an overview of the case and the BWS. Then, it will show how both theories view the case. Overall, this paper argues that Mill’s theory is a better theory that supports the verdict. R.v Lavallee: Brief Overview The case is centered on Angelique Lyn Lavallee. Lavallee was in an abusive relationship with her husband, Kevin Rust. Lavallee was in an abusive, emotional, and physical relationship with Rust for nearly four years. Lavallee often visited the hospital for injuries and she lied to the hospital staff when questioned about her injuries. On August 31st, the couple hosted a party at their home and got into an argument. Rust threatened Lavallee’s life and in fear Lavallee shot Rust as he exited the room, killing Rust immediately. During the trial, many witnesses came and provided testimony that Lavallee was being abused by Rust severely. Dr. Shane, a medical psychiatrist diagnosed Lavallee and concluded that she has symptoms of BWS. In the end, the court concludedShow MoreRelatedKant And Mill On Animal Ethics Essay1365 Words   |  6 PagesIn this essay I will begin by explaining the overall views of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, then compare and contrast the ideas and philos ophies of Kant and Mill on Animal Ethics. I believe that Kant, the deontologist, will not care as much about the duty/responsibility between humans and animals as Mill, the utilitarian, who will see the extreme importance of animal ethics. After studying and explaining the views and teachings of these two philosophers I will see if my thesis was correct,Read More Immanuel Kants Ethics Of Pure Duty and John Stuart Mills Utilitarian Ethics Of Justice2753 Words   |  12 PagesImmanuel Kants The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals and John Stuart Mills Utilitarianism Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book, Utilitarianism thatRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill And Immanuel Kant1786 Words   |  8 PagesJohn Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. They both had very different views when it came to the ethics of philosophy. They also though had some of the same views as each other. Both were concerned with the moral qualities of actions and choices of a person, but neither of them was much interested in about what makes a good person. They also different views and some of the same views when it came to lying. One thought it should never be done. The other thought it should be used as a last resort. FirstRead MoreMoral Judgements Are Morally Wrong?2025 Words   |  9 PagesEthics is an area of philosophy that deals with what is morally right and what is morally wrong behavior. Inside of ethics, there are two major views of thinking when making choices about different principles. Deontology is the idea that choices should be made based on obeying moral norms. Moral judgements are contained in an act alone. A deontologist would decide on the moral worth of an action based on the intention of the action. Immanuel Kant, an eighteenth century German philosopher, is consideredRead MoreMill and Kants Efforts to Solve an Ethical Dilemma822 Words   |  4 Pagesthe moral theories of John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant is solving an ethical dilemma. John Stuart Mill opens his utilitarian postulation by asserting that ethical statements cannot be subjected to scientific or mathematical provability (West 23). Mill’s utilitarianism is the moral standpoint that views actions as right or wrong in proportion to how they advance happiness or pleasure (Bailey 23). By maximizing utility, Mill implies increasing happiness (West 57). Mill urges moral actors toRead MoreThe Value Of A Life1454 Words   |  6 Pages â€Å"What is the value of a life?† This is a question that has plagued humanity for thousands of years. There doesn’t seem to be a definitive answer even after years of long thought and study. The main reason revolves around the idea of determining which qualities are needed in order to measure the â€Å"value of a life†. For example, is a person’s net worth the most important quality that needs to be considered or should other things be considered such as how many people was this person able to make happyRead MorePhilosophical Analysis of Aristotle883 Words   |  4 PagesAristotle Many theorists consider Aristotle to be the first person to use the term â€Å"ethics† in naming the field of study that had already been subject to develop by his predecessors Socrates and Plato. Philosophical ethics attempts in offering the rational response to the questions regarding how the human beings live. Aristotle used to be regarding politics and ethics as two related but very separate field of study because ethics examines the good concerning an individual, while politics is about examiningRead MoreKant: Moral Theories1002 Words   |  5 Pagesto Timmons, the field of philosophy is not complete without the mention of Kant whose contributions were major (205). This, he adds, was influenced by his originality, subtle approach and the difficulty of his works. Timmons cites that moral requirements are a requirement of reason, which is the ideology of Kant’s Moral theory; hence, immoral act is an act against reason. Consequently, speaking on the terminologies of Kant we visualize moral requirements as Categorical Imperatives (CI) grounded onRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill s Philosophy On The Morality And Ethical Nature Of The Subject1507 Words   |  7 Pageslives through use of their organs, a utilitarian like John Stuart Mill would argue that cloning is morally acceptable due to the maximized utility. Kantian Immanuel Kant is considered the central figure of modern philosophy. Kant sought to refute thinkers like David Hume and John Stuart Mill. Kantian Philosophy is considered deontological in that it holds that an action is right in and of itself without appeal to consequences. According to Kant, a faculty of the human mind called practical reasonRead MoreThe Philosohpy of Immanuel Kant1191 Words   |  5 PagesImmanuel Kant is referred to as the â€Å"father† of deontological ethics, which is also colloquially referred to as Kantianism, which provides a sophisticated explication of deontology. His philosophy embodies capitulating to one’s maxim, which he beliefs that to be good, however, only if one’s motives are unconditional and irrespective to external reason. The maxim is referred to as the individual’s intrinsic duty or obligation to one’s self or to others, which if applicable to everyone than it is congenial